By KATE HSU
Arguments for lifestyle affecting priority
With the rising shortages of available donor organs, there are many arguments for
considering lifestyle when prioritising patients for organ transplantation. Because
demand is exceeding supply, it is important that organs are allocated to recipients
who have the highest likelihood of success. Studies shows that patients who
maintain healthier lifestyles pre and post transplant tend to have better outcomes
and less chance of graft failure (PMC, 2015). By factoring in lifestyle behaviours
such as adherence to medical regimes or abstinence from alcohol, the success rate
of transplants can be optimised and ensure that limited resources are used as
effectively as possible.
Considering lifestyle as a criterion can not only improve clinical outcomes but also
act as a form for motivation as it may encourage patients to adopt healthier
behaviours. There are initiatives like patient education and lifestyle counselling which
have shown success in promoting positive behavioural changes among transplant
patients. This improves individual health and overall graft outcomes (Transplant
Living Community, 2024). In this way, lifestyle assessment is used as a supportive
measure rather than punishment.
Finally, public perception also plays an important role as research suggests that
many people are more willing to donate their organs if they believe that they will be
given to recipients who have shown more responsibility to their health (PMC, 2015).
Incorporating lifestyle factors into this allocation process can enhance public trust in
the transplant system and may potentially increase donation rates.
Arguments against lifestyle affecting priority
There are many challenges like bias, fairness, and ethics when it comes to
arguments against prioritising organ transplant recipients based on lifestyle. Firstly,
deciding what counts as “unhealthy” is very subjective and shaped by cultural and
social context. Behaviours may be considered avoidable in one community and
understandable in a community facing hardships. The World Medical Association
(WMA) says that “organ allocation should not be influenced by lifestyle or
behavioural history but instead based on medical need and the likelihood of a
successful outcome” (WMA, 2022).
Low-income demographics may also experience discrimination as they are not able
to access healthcare readily. This therefore makes it harder for them to meet lifestyle
standards. There is increased discrimination when it comes to transplant decisions
against people with disabilities because assumptions are based on ability to adhere
with post-operative care (National Council on Disability, 2019). Such practices can
enhance existing health inequalities and violate ethical commitments to justice and
equal access. Medical ethics emphasise that treatment decisions must be based on
need, not judgment (WMA, 2022). Prioritising patients based on lifestyle risks
creates a system that punishes the disadvantaged instead of supporting their
recovery and wellbeing.
Conclusion
The question of whether lifestyle should affect a patient’s position on the liver
transplant list is a very complex ethical debate. There are several valid medical
reasons for considering lifestyle as patients who show healthier behaviours and
commitment to recovery are more likely to have better outcomes. Adherence to post-
operative regimes is crucial as it affects the transplant success and with the limited
livers available, doctors must select carefully on who they give livers to. However,
using lifestyle as a criterion can be seen as discrimination and unfair. Many lifestyle-
related conditions influenced by social factors like poverty, education, and mental
health may mean that this lifestyle was not by choice therefore punishing those for
their past behaviours can exacerbate disparity and contradict core medical ethics of
justice and non-maleficence.
This essay has explored many different perspectives, zooming in on ethical
principles, giving case studies and showing medical evidence. Tension lies in
balancing fair and compassionate treatment for all patients while also ensuring that
the limited transplant resources is best used. Ultimately, even though lifestyle factors
can provide additional medical information which can impact transplant success,
they should not be used as punishment or judgment, but instead as a way to
determine success rate of a transplant or whether a patient is willing to adhere to
post-operative measures. Ethical organ allocation should be based on a combination
of medical need, likelihood of success, and fair access. As innovators in
transplantation technology emerge and advance, this debate may evolve further, but
for now, decisions must be guided by compassion, evidence and fairness.
Bibliography
AP News. (2025). Chinese scientists successfully transplant gene-edited pig liver.
[online] Available at:
https://apnews.com/articles/7e4fcdb83b2371d8659e77089b5ba
British Liver Trust (2023). Liver disease and lifestyle. [online] Available at:
https://britishlivertrust.org.uk
British Liver Trust. (2024a). Liver conditions and lifestyle risks. [online] Available
at: https://britishlivertrust.org.uk
British Liver Trust. (2024b). Statistics on liver disease. [online] Available at:
https://britishlivertrust.org.uk/information-and-support/statistics/
British Liver Trust. (2024c). Alcohol and health inequalities. [online] Available at:
https://britishlivertrust.org.uk/alcohol-health-inequalities/
Healthline. (2024). How Organ Transplants Work. [online] Available at:
https://www.healthline.com/health/organ-transplant
HRSA (2025). Organ donation statistics. [online] www.organdonor.gov. Available
at: https://www.organdonor.gov/learn/organ-donation-statistics
Liver Foundation. (2024). Understanding Fatty Liver Disease. [online] Available at:
https://liverfoundation.org
Mayo Clinic. (2024). Artificial Liver Transplantation Projects. [online] Available at:
https://www.mayo.edu/research/labs/artificial-liver-transplantation/projects
MedlinePlus. (2024). Organ Donation and Transplantation. [online] Available at:
https://medlineplus.gov/organdonation.html
Mind. (2024). Alcohol and mental health. [online] Available at:
https://www.mind.org.uk/information-support/types-of-mental-health-
problems/alcohol-and-mental-health/
National Council on Disability. (2019). Organ Transplant Discrimination Against
People with Disabilities. [online] Available at:
https://www.ncd.gov/assets/uploads/reports/2019/ncd_organ_transplant_508.p
df
NHS Blood and Transplant (NHSBT). (2024a). Organ Donation: Policies and
Guidance. [online] Available at: https://www.odt.nhs.uk/transplantation/tools-
policies-and-guidance/policies-and-guidance/
NHS Blood and Transplant (NHSBT). (2024b). Liver Transplantation Selection
Criteria (POL195). [online] Available at:
https://nhsbtdbe.blob.core.windows.net/umbraco-assets-corps/32989/pol195-
liver-transplantation-selection-criteria-260324.pdf
NHS Blood and Transplant (NHSBT). (2024c). Organ Transplantation Offering
System. [online] Available at: https://www.nhsbt.nhsuk/organ-
transplantation/kidney/receiving-a-kidney/how-does-the-offering-system-work/
NHS England. (2024a). Definitions for health inequalities. [online Available at:
https://www.england.nhs.uk/ltphimenu.definitions-for-health-inequalities/
NHS England. (2024b). Dual diagnosis: Mental health and substance misuse.
[online] Available at: https://www.england.nhs.uk/mental-health/adults/dual-
diagnosis/
NPR. (2018). Liver Transplant Policies Raise Questions. [online] Available at:
https://www.npr.org/sections/health-shots/
Organ Donation NHS. (2024). How organ donation works. [online] Available at:
https://www.organdonation.nhs.uk
PMC. (2015). Should patients with self-inflicted liver disease be considered for
transplant? [online] Available at:
https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4510720/
PMC. (2018). The 6-Month Rule in Alcohol-Related Liver Disease. [online] Available
at: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5814516/
PMC. (2024). 3D Bioprinting of Liver Tissue. [online] Available at:
https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10724374/
ScienceDirect. (2023). Bioartificial Liver Systems. [online] Available at:
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/articles/abs/pii/S0168827823000181
ScienceDirect. (2024a). Beneficence. [online] Available at:
https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/medicine-and-denisty/beneficence
ScienceDirect. (2024b). Non-maleficence. [online] Available at:
https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/engineering/nonmalificience
The Guardian. (2025). Surgeons transplant genetically modified pig liver into
Chinese Patient. [online] Available at:
https://www.theguardian.com/science/2025/mar/26/surgeons-transplant-
genetically-modified-pig-liver-into-chinese-patient
The Medic Portal. (2024). Medical Ethics: Four Pillars and Key Theories. [online]
Available at: https://www.themedicportal.com/application-guide/medical-school-
interview/medical-ethics
TIME. (2025). Scientists successfully test pig liver transplant in human. [online]
Available at: https://time.com/7271780/scientists-pig-liver-transplant/
UK Government. (2024). Health Matters: Health Literacy. [online] Available at:
https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/health-matters-health-literacy
UNOS. (2018). Organ Allocation Policies. Available at: https://unos.org
VoxelMatters. (2024). 3D BioLabs demonstrates new approach for producing
organs. [online] Available at: https://www.voxelmatters.com/3d-biolabs-
demonstrates-new-appraoch-for-producing-organs
World Medical Association. (2017). IWMA Statement on Human Organ Donation
and Transplantation. [online] Available at: https://www.wma.net/policies-
post/wma-statement-on-human-organ-donation-and-transplantation/
Wanman